Notary record

docsify@5.1.0

npm · checked 30 Oct 2026, 04:19 UTC · checker 2026-10-19.2 · log index 1073

Record issued 30 Oct 2026

Issued 30 Oct 2026, 04:19 UTC · docsify@5.1.0 · npm

quiet

Its install steps ran with decoy credentials in reach and touched nothing we watch.

Its install steps ran here, with decoy credentials in reach, and touched nothing we watch: no network, no credential files. That is evidence, not proof: code can wait for a different machine or run later, when it is used.

The trace shows what a step attempted. A quiet trace is evidence, not proof.

Check another package

Install steps

docsify runs this install step of its own:

  • postinstall

No dependency runs anything at install.

What the install steps reached

No install step reached anything we watch.

Programs
node, opencollective-postinstall
Credentials read
No credential file or variable was opened.
Credentials sent
No decoy left the box.

The record keeps what all the install steps reached together; it does not say which step did which.

First import

It was imported once, as an application would, and exited 1.

It reached nothing we watch.

Programs
node
Credentials read
No credential file or variable was opened.
Credentials sent
No decoy left the box.

loading it exited 1; many libraries need configuration or a host to load, so this says little either way

Dependencies

7 of 7 installed, as npm would on linux x64 musl.

Show all 7
  • common-tags@1.8.2
  • dexie@4.4.7
  • marked@18.1.2
  • medium-zoom@1.1.2
  • opencollective-postinstall@2.0.3
  • prismjs@1.30.0
  • tinydate@1.3.0

Since the previous version

Changed since 5.0.0: the postinstall step runs a different command. Read the change before installing.

Compared with
5.0.0
Changed
postinstall

From the npm registry manifests of both versions; not part of the signed record.

What it did, compared with the record of 5.0.0

Since 5.0.0: level unfinished in 5.0.0, now quiet.

Level
unfinished → quiet

A comparison of the notary's signed records of both versions, made when this page is read; not part of either signature. A difference is a lead, not a verdict: two runs can differ for the sandbox's reasons too.

Sandbox

Decoys presentStand-in networkTracer ebpf

network=none; capabilities=all-dropped; rootfs=read-only; user=nobody; harness=separate-user

Signature and transparency log

level
quiet
verdict
approved
reasonCode
ran_ok
keyId
322a2536e0d5ec8e
algorithm
ed25519
checker
2026-10-19.2
issuedAt
2026-10-30T04:19:48Z
contentSha256
22dd94cc2362571f08fa5f324a9e3bcff952cecb9db23dfb9127a4a415e496a4
contentSizeBytes
1189537 (1.1 MB)
outputSha256
560f68a6c648e7d094bde3b8033e344a2f64e52b4affebc94f8f8891ab85192e
log index
1073

Verify the signature yourself, in your browser, at /verify. Kenwea is not in that loop.

Inclusion proofCheckpointKey list

Issued 30 Oct 2026, 04:19 UTC

What this does and does not say

The claim is about the bytes, not the name.

The signature covers these exact bytes. Another version is another check.

A quiet trace is evidence, not proof.

Code that only runs later, when your app calls it, is out of reach.

A signature is not an endorsement.

It says what happened, not that the code is good.

Twenty checks an hour for each network address. When a limit is ours, the record says unfinished and names it.